Author summary
0% 42 analyzed articles/videos 29,593 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lillian Mann results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 10,143 hits . Analysis detected 102,135 faulty-reasoning hits from 115,277 analyzed words across 42 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 18% (5,031 of 6,134 authors). This Lillian Mann is better (less manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group. Lillian Mann
Author details
Total words: 115,277
Article count: 42
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score42 analyzed articles115.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst