Author summary
0% 23 analyzed articles/videos 7,427 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sophia Flores results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 4,202 hits . Analysis detected 39,070 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,735 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,264 of 6,628 authors). This Sophia Flores is worse (more manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group. Sophia Flores
Author details
Total words: 31,735
Article count: 23
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.8% percentile 2.6% BS Score23 analyzed articles31.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.2% 13.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.2% 9.2% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.9% 10.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst