Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video338 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Frank Lara-Risco results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 169 hits. Analysis detected 1,019 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (1,911 of 6,263 authors). This Frank Lara-Risco is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
Frank Lara-Risco
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
70%Frank Lara-Risco (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,352
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

70% percentile
025507510069.5% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.2%10.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.5%12.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 10.2%10.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Author 5.2%5.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 5.7%5.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Red Herring: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos