Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 241 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taylor Tinsley results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Self-Serving Bias , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 78% saturation with 752 hits . Analysis detected 3,003 faulty-reasoning hits from 964 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.2% and a BS Rank of 98% (183 of 6,628 authors). This Taylor Tinsley is worse (more manipulative) than 97.30% of the peer group. Taylor Tinsley
Author details
Total words: 964
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
97% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 97.3% percentile 14.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles964 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 78.0% 78.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 36.6% 36.6% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 15.8% 15.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 17.9% 17.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 13.5% 13.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.1% 9.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 16.1% 16.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 8.3% 8.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 10.0% 10.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 12.2% 12.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 78.0%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Author 36.6%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 21.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 17.9%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.6%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 16.1%, sitewide 7.5% Straw Man: Author 15.8%, sitewide 0.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 13.5%, sitewide 0.5% Halo Effect: Author 12.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 12.2%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 12.0%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 10.0%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Author 8.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Tu Quoque: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.2% Begging the Question: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst