La.: Senate approves new congressional map, now heading to House 16%

By Lillian Mann0%

5/14/2026, 6:58:04 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Representativeness Heuristic, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 44 hits. Analysis detected 305 faulty-reasoning hits from 420 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 32.1% and a BS Rank of 16% (17,245 of 20,369 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 84.70% of the article peer group.

A general view of the Louisiana State Capitol on April 17, 2020 in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. 
(Photo by Chris Graythen/Getty Images) 
OAN Staff Lillian Mann 
6:56 PM  Thursday, May 14, 2026 
Two weeks after the U.S. 
Supreme Court invalidated Louisiana’s previous congressional boundaries, the state Senate approved a revised map on Thursday in a 27–10 party-line vote. 
Sponsored by Senator Jay Morris (R-La.), the proposal now heads to the state House of Representatives for consideration as lawmakers rush to meet deadlines ahead of the November elections. 
This legislative push follows a high court ruling that found the state’s prior map had illegally used race as the “predominant factor” in drawing a second majority-Black district, requiring Louisiana to redraw its lines to comply with the Equal Protection Clause. 
The redistricting effort in Louisiana mirrors a broader trend across the South, where Republican-led legislatures have moved to redraw maps following recent legal shifts regarding the federal Voting Rights Act. 
President Donald Trump has actively encouraged GOP leaders in these states to finalize maps that maximize the party’s advantage, aiming to bolster the Republican edge in a narrowly divided U.S. 
House of Representatives. 
If the current measure backed by Morris is signed into law, it is expected to dismantle the state’s second majority-Black district, likely shifting the congressional delegation from its current 4–2 split to a 5–1 Republican advantage. 
“These maps are drawn to maximize Republican advantage for the incumbent Republicans that we have in Congress,” Morris said, according to The Associated Press. 
Under this proposal, the current 6th District  represented by Representative Cleo Fields (D-La.)  would be dismantled and reshaped into a Republican-leaning seat centered around communities in South Louisiana and the Baton Rouge suburbs. 
To address the recent Supreme Court ruling, the legislation scraps the existing version of the 6th District. 
The measure preserves the 2nd District, currently held by Representative Troy Carter (D-La.). 
This district would extend from New Orleans to a portion of Baton Rouge and is expected to remain a Democrat stronghold. 
However, the new boundaries could potentially pit Carter against Fields in a future primary. 
If the state House of Representatives grants final approval to the map by the June 1st deadline, the bill will move to the governor’s desk for signature, likely securing a 5–1 Republican advantage for the state’s congressional delegation ahead of the November 2026 elections 
Stay informed! 
Receive breaking news alerts directly to your inbox for free. 
Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.0%Lillian Mann: 4.7%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.6%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 2.9%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 7.1%Lillian Mann: 1.3%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic7.1%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 1.1%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%Lillian Mann: 1.5%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias5.0%This article: 6.9%Lillian Mann: 8.6%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect6.9%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.2%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.6%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.5%Lillian Mann: 2.4%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias10.5%This article: 8.6%Lillian Mann: 1.1%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias8.6%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 8.8%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 2.8%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%Lillian Mann: 2.0%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias7.1%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 3.3%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 1.0%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 1.2%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 4.2%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 1.6%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.5%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.1%Lillian Mann: 4.2%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization7.1%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.5%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 6.7%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 4.0%Lillian Mann: 1.3%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question4.0%This article: 8.6%Lillian Mann: 2.5%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.6%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.8%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 1.0%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 1.8%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.7%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 1.7%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 1.6%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 5.0%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.8%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Mann: 2.9%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Lillian Mann: 1.5%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.6%

420 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers6.7%attributed speech392writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageOAN Staff • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageJay Morris (R-La.) • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jay Morris (R-La.)

0%flagged-word coverage
24 attributed words86% of attributed speech57% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.8 ptsWriter: 3.8%Jay Morris (R-La.): 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.