Keyword summary
35% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,789 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Map results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 1,137 hits . Analysis detected 8,196 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,954 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (31,513 of 34,379 keywords). This Congressional Map is better (less manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group. Congressional Map
Keyword details
Total words: 12,954
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.3% percentile 1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles13K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst