Keyword summary
35%5 analyzed articles/videos2,789 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Congressional Map results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 1,137 hits. Analysis detected 8,196 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,954 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (31,513 of 34,379 keywords). This Congressional Map is better (less manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group.
Congressional Map
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
9%Congressional Map (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

8% percentile
02550751008.3% percentile
1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles13K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate