Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,626 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alex Tabet results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 33.1% saturation with 2,412 hits . Analysis detected 14,512 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,292 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,516 of 6,309 authors). This Alex Tabet is worse (more manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group. Alex Tabet
Author details
Total words: 7,292
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.0% percentile 4.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 10.5% 10.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 33.1% 33.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.8% 7.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 11.7% 11.7% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.9% 5.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.0% 3.0% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Author 4.4% 4.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 33.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.8%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Author 11.7%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 3.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Author 7.8%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Genetic Fallacy: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3% Horn Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Red Herring: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.7% Straw Man: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.9% No True Scotsman: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst