Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,155 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Devin Thomas O’Shea results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 614 hits . Analysis detected 5,143 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,310 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,098 of 6,316 authors). This Devin Thomas O’Shea is worse (more manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group. Devin Thomas O’Shea
Author details
Total words: 4,310
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
67% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.8% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.4% 8.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.7% 13.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.0% 7.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.0%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst