Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video2,155 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Devin Thomas O’Shea results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 614 hits. Analysis detected 5,143 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,310 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,098 of 6,316 authors). This Devin Thomas O’Shea is worse (more manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group.
Devin Thomas O’Shea
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
67%Devin Thomas O’Shea (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,310
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

67% percentile
025507510066.8% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.2%7.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 14.3%14.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.7%13.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.1%5.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.9%2.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.0%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Author 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos