Author summary
90% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,681 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chuck Ross results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 5,830 hits . Analysis detected 35,963 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,396 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,730 of 6,358 authors). This Chuck Ross is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group. Chuck Ross
Author details
Total words: 25,396
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.1% percentile 2.9% BS Score8 analyzed articles25.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 16.9% 16.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.8% 16.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 15.4% 15.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.0% 8.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.9% 8.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 23.0%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 16.9%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 15.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Author 8.9%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Genetic Fallacy: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Horn Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst