Abdul El-Sayed Urged Mass Release of Prisoners and Touted 'Decarceration' Policies in Bizarre Webinar Where He Chatted Up Murderer and Rapist 83%

By Chuck Ross90%

6/29/2026, 9:00:55 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ad Hominem, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 55.2% saturation with 291 hits. Analysis detected 1,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 527 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 74.5% and a BS Rank of 83% (3,729 of 21,180 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 82.40% of the article peer group.

Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed (D.), appearing alongside a convicted murderer and a registered sex offender in a webinar with a prison abolition group, endorsed "any and all efforts to get people out of jails and prisons" and said locking up criminals was akin to "robbing" them of their freedom. 
El-Sayed was the featured guest on a webinar hosted by the Carceral State Project and the American Friends Service Committee in August 2020 regarding their report "I Don't Want to Die in Prison." 
The American Friends Service Committee advertised the show—using the hashtags #FreeThemAll and #AbolishPrison—as a platform to "discuss the report findings and the road to decarceration and abolition with Abdul El-Sayed." 
El-Sayed, who thanked his webinar hosts for "hosting such a critical conversation," endorsed "decarceration," a policy to release prisoners en masse and adopt non-prison penalties for criminals, while casting prisoners as victims of an unjust criminal justice system. 
"Not only are we taking people's rights from them, but also we have failed to provide them the basic means of a dignified life," said El-Sayed. 
"Every choice we make about incarcerating somebody is about robbing that somebody from the people who love them and the people who need them." 
"Any and all efforts to get people out of jails and prisons and to keep people out of jails and prisons is policy that we need to be investing in," El-Sayed, who is leading in most polls against his more moderate Democratic rivals Haley Stevens and Mallory McMorrow ahead of the August 4 Democratic Senate primary, went on. 
While El-Sayed's message may not hurt his standing with Democratic voters, it could prove a political liability in November's general election for the open seat, which is considered a toss-up. 
Republicans have cast El-Sayed, who ran for Michigan governor in 2018, as "dangerous" and "extreme," citing his dalliance with socialists like Hasan Piker, the left-wing influencer who said that "America deserved 9/11" and that Israel is "much worse" than Hamas. 
El-Sayed campaigned with Amir Makled, a candidate for the University of Michigan Board of Regents who called slain Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah a "martyr." 
El-Sayed was joined on the webinar by former prisoners Martin Vargas, a registered sex offender convicted of raping a 17-year-old girl, and LaWanda Hollister, who served 34 years in prison for second-degree murder. 
Months earlier, El-Sayed appeared as a podcast guest of Joshua Hoe, a former University of Michigan debate coach who pleaded guilty to soliciting a 14-year-old girl for sex. 
El-Sayed urged Hoe, a registered sex offender, and other ex-cons to run for political office, saying their "voice is needed," the Washington Free Beacon reported. 
El-Sayed endorsed other soft-on-crime policies during the COVID-19 era. 
He has deleted social media posts from 2020 in which he endorsed the movement to "defund" police departments. 
He served on the board of Sunrise Movement, a left-wing group that has called to "abolish" police departments and referred to police officers as "fascist pigs," the Free Beacon reported. 
El-Sayed's campaign did not respond to a request for comment. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 3.9%freebeacon.com: 7.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.5%freebeacon.com: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.6%Chuck Ross: 2.8%freebeacon.com: 2.9%Availability Heuristic7.6%This article: 4.7%Chuck Ross: 0.8%freebeacon.com: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic4.7%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.1%freebeacon.com: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 37.4%Chuck Ross: 16.8%freebeacon.com: 12.8%Framing Effect37.4%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.2%freebeacon.com: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.3%freebeacon.com: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.1%freebeacon.com: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.2%freebeacon.com: 0.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Chuck Ross: 0.9%freebeacon.com: 1.4%Pessimism Bias5.7%This article: 55.2%Chuck Ross: 23.0%freebeacon.com: 15.7%Negativity Bias55.2%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.6%freebeacon.com: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Chuck Ross: 1.3%freebeacon.com: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error3.4%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.4%freebeacon.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 1.3%freebeacon.com: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Chuck Ross: 1.5%freebeacon.com: 1.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias5.7%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 1.2%freebeacon.com: 2.1%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 3.3%freebeacon.com: 1.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 1.9%freebeacon.com: 1.1%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 11.0%Chuck Ross: 0.7%freebeacon.com: 0.6%Primacy Effect11.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 17.1%Chuck Ross: 8.9%freebeacon.com: 5.9%Ad Hominem17.1%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.3%freebeacon.com: 1.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 1.5%freebeacon.com: 3.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.8%freebeacon.com: 2.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.3%freebeacon.com: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.7%Chuck Ross: 4.6%freebeacon.com: 8.8%Hasty Generalization5.7%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 1.3%freebeacon.com: 0.9%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.4%freebeacon.com: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.7%Chuck Ross: 8.0%freebeacon.com: 5.8%Appeal to Emotion5.7%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.8%freebeacon.com: 1.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.4%Chuck Ross: 2.2%freebeacon.com: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.4%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.3%freebeacon.com: 1.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 1.3%freebeacon.com: 1.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.1%freebeacon.com: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.1%freebeacon.com: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.5%freebeacon.com: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.9%Chuck Ross: 1.4%freebeacon.com: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.9%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.1%freebeacon.com: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.1%freebeacon.com: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 3.5%freebeacon.com: 2.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.0%Chuck Ross: 4.5%freebeacon.com: 2.8%Unattributed Quote11.0%This article: 9.5%Chuck Ross: 4.2%freebeacon.com: 2.6%Quote-first Misdirection9.5%This article: 12.9%Chuck Ross: 15.4%freebeacon.com: 17.7%Biased Writer Voice12.9%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.8%freebeacon.com: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 5.7%Chuck Ross: 1.1%freebeacon.com: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias5.7%This article: 7.6%Chuck Ross: 16.9%freebeacon.com: 10.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias7.6%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.2%freebeacon.com: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

527 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers31%attributed speech364writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageAbdul El-Sayed • 26 words • 0.0% coverageAbdul El-Sayed • 24 words • 0.0% coverageAbdul El-Sayed • 58 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWashington Free Beacon • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWashington Free Beacon • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
55 attributed words34% of attributed speech88% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Biased Writer Voice-18.7 ptsWriter: 18.7%Washington Free Beacon: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-13.7 ptsWriter: 13.7%Washington Free Beacon: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -11.0 ptsWriter: 11.0%Washington Free Beacon: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-8.2 ptsWriter: 8.2%Washington Free Beacon: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.