Keyword summary
84%5 analyzed articles/videos3,444 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michigan Senate results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 2,718 hits. Analysis detected 26,060 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,860 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 36% (23,022 of 35,716 keywords). This Michigan Senate is better (less manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group.
Michigan Senate
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
36%Michigan Senate (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 22,860
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

36% percentile
025507510035.5% percentile
2.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles22.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.9%11.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.9%11.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 2.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate