‘We Need Your Voice’: Abdul El-Sayed Urged Registered Sex Offender Debate Coach To Run for Office, Told Him ‘You Have Something Deep To Offer’ 72%

By Chuck Ross89%

6/25/2026, 7:25:23 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Indoctrination, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 48.3% saturation with 419 hits. Analysis detected 1,499 faulty-reasoning hits from 868 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 64.5% and a BS Rank of 72% (6,151 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 71.90% of the article peer group.

Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed (D.), in a podcast interview with a sex offender convicted of soliciting an underage girl for sex, urged ex-cons to run for political office, saying their "voice" is needed in politics. 
The left-wing Democrat made the plea in an April 2020 episode of the Decarceration Nation podcast, hosted by Joshua Hoe, a former University of Michigan debate coach who pleaded guilty in 2010 to soliciting a 14-year-old girl for sex in an online chatroom. 
Hoe, now 58, served four years in prison and is now a registered sex offender. 
Hoe, whose podcast is aimed at "radically re-imagining America’s criminal justice system," asked El-Sayed his advice to former prisoners seeking to run for political office. 
"Please do," said El-Sayed, a University of Michigan graduate. 
"We need your voice, folks who are affected by the experiences that you've had uniquely need your voice." 
"I hope that you'll run, and I hope that when you do, you'll find me out and let me have the opportunity to support," added El-Sayed, who has surged to the lead in a heated three-way primary to replace outgoing Sen. 
Gary Peters (D.). 
El-Sayed, who ran unsuccessfully for Michigan governor in 2018, has embraced progressive views of criminal justice involving "decarceration," an aspirational term for the dismantling of what he and Hoe both referred to disapprovingly as "the criminal punishment system." 
"Folks who've had an experience with a deeply broken system, you have something deep to offer," El-Sayed told Hoe. 
"For folks who've had experiences with the criminal punishment system, I just think it's so important for you to get out there to share your voice and your experiences." 
El-Sayed’s commiseration with a registered sex offender could prove a political liability in the Senate race, which Democrats view as a must-win in November for the party to take control of the Senate. 
El-Sayed’s dalliance with Hoe could also undermine his campaign trail emphasis on denunciations of the network of the late financier Jeffrey Epstein, who registered as a sex offender in 2008 after pleading guilty to attempting to solicit a minor for sex. 
El-Sayed has accused the Trump administration of slowing the release of the so-called Epstein files to protect President Trump, a longtime Palm Beach, Fla., acquaintance of Epstein’s who cut ties with him years before he was accused of sex crimes. 
El-Sayed also said in a private campaign strategy call that he planned to use the Epstein issue to distract from questions about the February 2026 killing of Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, which he said was upsetting to voters in Dearborn, a majority-Muslim city considered a key voting bloc for Democrats. 
"I'm just gonna go straight to pedophilia, frankly," El-Sayed said, in remarks first revealed by the Washington Free Beacon. 
"I'll just be like, 'Pedophile president decides that he doesn't like the front page news, so he decides to take us into another war.'" 
El-Sayed has made opposition to Israel the centerpiece of his campaign. 
El-Sayed, who has hammered primary opponent Rep. 
Haley Stevens (D., Mich.) for receiving support from AIPAC, has campaigned with Hasan Piker, the left-wing influencer who said, "America deserved 9/11," and that Israel is "worse than Hamas." 
He campaigned with Amir Makled, a candidate for University of Michigan Board of Regents who called Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah a "martyr" after his assassination by the Israeli military. 
El-Sayed’s rhetoric may be attracting unsavory figures to his campaign. 
Earlier this month, the DOJ indicted Mariam Odeh, a former El-Sayed campaign aide, as part of a conspiracy to terrorize Jewish officials, businesses, and groups at the University of Michigan. 
Hoe’s criminal history and his anti-prison advocacy work were well-known when he interviewed El-Sayed, who appeared on the podcast to promote his book, Healing Politics. 
Hoe, who noted in the podcast that he organized a festival at the University of Michigan where El-Sayed met his future wife, referred to himself as "formerly incarcerated" and discussed his lobbying efforts to reform Michigan’s sex offender registration system. 
In May 2020, as a lobbyist at the advocacy group Safe & Just Michigan, Hoe testified before the Michigan legislature to oppose a public sex offender registry system, asserting that they make Michigan less safe. 
He called to make registries available solely to law enforcement agencies, and to "end distance requirements" that prohibit sex offenders from living near schools. 
El-Sayed has not publicly weighed in on the sex offender registry issue, but he has embraced a number of other soft-on-crime positions throughout his career. 
El-Sayed has called to "abolish" ICE, and endorsed the movement to "defund" police departments in a series of deleted tweets from 2020. 
El-Sayed was a director of Michigan United, an anti-police group that organized a May 2020 protest in Detroit that turned deadly after a gunman opened fire during the event, the Free Beacon reported. 
El-Sayed, a former CNN commentator, served on the board of Sunrise Movement, a left-wing group that has called to "abolish" police departments, and referred to police officers as "fascist pigs." 
El-Sayed’s campaign did not respond to requests for comment. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.6%Chuck Ross: 3.9%freebeacon.com: 7.0%Confirmation Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.5%freebeacon.com: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Chuck Ross: 2.8%freebeacon.com: 2.9%Availability Heuristic2.9%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.8%freebeacon.com: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.1%freebeacon.com: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 34.2%Chuck Ross: 16.8%freebeacon.com: 12.7%Framing Effect34.2%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.2%freebeacon.com: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.3%freebeacon.com: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.1%freebeacon.com: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.3%Chuck Ross: 0.2%freebeacon.com: 0.8%Optimism Bias4.3%This article: 1.2%Chuck Ross: 0.9%freebeacon.com: 1.4%Pessimism Bias1.2%This article: 48.3%Chuck Ross: 23.0%freebeacon.com: 15.7%Negativity Bias48.3%This article: 4.7%Chuck Ross: 0.6%freebeacon.com: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias4.7%This article: 3.8%Chuck Ross: 1.3%freebeacon.com: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error3.8%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.4%freebeacon.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 1.3%freebeacon.com: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Chuck Ross: 1.5%freebeacon.com: 1.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.3%This article: 4.4%Chuck Ross: 1.2%freebeacon.com: 2.1%Halo Effect4.4%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 3.3%freebeacon.com: 1.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.0%Chuck Ross: 1.9%freebeacon.com: 1.1%Recency Bias5.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.7%freebeacon.com: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 8.9%freebeacon.com: 5.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.3%freebeacon.com: 1.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 1.5%freebeacon.com: 3.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.8%freebeacon.com: 2.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.3%freebeacon.com: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.8%Chuck Ross: 4.6%freebeacon.com: 8.7%Hasty Generalization3.8%This article: 4.7%Chuck Ross: 1.3%freebeacon.com: 0.9%Red Herring4.7%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.4%freebeacon.com: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.8%Chuck Ross: 8.0%freebeacon.com: 5.8%Appeal to Emotion2.8%This article: 2.9%Chuck Ross: 0.8%freebeacon.com: 1.2%Begging the Question2.9%This article: 5.0%Chuck Ross: 2.2%freebeacon.com: 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.3%freebeacon.com: 0.9%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.0%Chuck Ross: 1.3%freebeacon.com: 1.1%Burden of Proof1.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.1%freebeacon.com: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.1%freebeacon.com: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.3%Chuck Ross: 0.5%freebeacon.com: 2.1%Anecdotal3.3%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 1.4%freebeacon.com: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.1%freebeacon.com: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.0%freebeacon.com: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.1%freebeacon.com: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 3.5%freebeacon.com: 2.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 4.5%freebeacon.com: 2.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 5.0%Chuck Ross: 4.2%freebeacon.com: 2.6%Quote-first Misdirection5.0%This article: 22.2%Chuck Ross: 15.4%freebeacon.com: 17.5%Biased Writer Voice22.2%This article: 5.4%Chuck Ross: 0.8%freebeacon.com: 1.6%Indoctrination5.4%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 1.1%freebeacon.com: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 16.9%freebeacon.com: 10.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chuck Ross: 0.2%freebeacon.com: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

868 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers28%attributed speech629writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 100.0% coverageJoshua Hoe • 15 words • 0.0% coverageJoshua Hoe • 25 words • 0.0% coverageAbdul El-Sayed • 9 words • 0.0% coverageAbdul El-Sayed • 18 words • 100.0% coverageAbdul El-Sayed • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageAbdul El-Sayed • 19 words • 0.0% coverageAbdul El-Sayed • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 52 words • 0.0% coverageAbdul El-Sayed • 19 words • 100.0% coverageAbdul El-Sayed • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageJoshua Hoe • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Abdul El-Sayed

94%flagged-word coverage
159 attributed words67% of attributed speech95% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Indoctrination+29.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Abdul El-Sayed: 29.6%29.6%Biased Writer Voice-15.7 ptsWriter: 27.7%Abdul El-Sayed: 11.9%11.9%Quote-first Misdirection+8.1 ptsWriter: 3.8%Abdul El-Sayed: 11.9%11.9%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.