Speaker summary
54% 41 analyzed articles/videos 3,898.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abdul El-Sayed results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 558.456 hits . Analysis detected 6,063.742 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,898.333 analyzed words across 41 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 1% (26,572 of 26,730 speakers). This Abdul El-Sayed is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group. Abdul El-Sayed
Speaker details
Total words: 3,898.333
Article count: 41
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.6% percentile 2.9% BS Score41 analyzed videos3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst