Fox News88%

Michigan Dem hopeful Abdul El-Sayed jabs CNN giving him 'non-consensual colonoscopy' in recent interviews 84%

7/21/2026, 12:42:54 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 50.3% saturation with 222 hits. Analysis detected 1,151 faulty-reasoning hits from 441 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 75.3% and a BS Rank of 84% (3,539 of 21,175 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 83.30% of the article peer group.

Democratic Michigan Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed took a swipe at CNN over what he suggests are uncomfortable appearances he has had on the network. 
"I go on CNN every once in a while and I get a non-consensual colonoscopy," El-Sayed quipped at a rally in Grand Rapids on Sunday, sparking laughs from the crowd. 
"And then, all they ask me about is another country, and they're like, 'All he's ever talking about is another country.' 
No! 
I just want everybody to understand that there's an opportunity cost to the money being sent over there, and that is what we could have over here," he continued. 
DEMOCRATS' CIVIL WAR HEADS TO MICHIGAN WHERE PROGRESSIVES FACE BIGGEST TEST YET IN HIGH-STAKES SENATE SHOWDOWN 
CNN did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital 's request for comment. 
Earlier in the day, El-Sayed appeared on CNN's "State of the Union," where he was grilled by anchor Jake Tapper about previously-leaked audio of him saying he didn't want to comment on the killing of Iranian Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in February in order not to offend any of his constituents. 
SOCIALIST-BACKED MICHIGAN SENATE HOPEFUL CALLS AMERICAN POLITICS A 'DISEASE' AFTER PROFESSING LOVE FOR US 
"Why were you worried about people who supported the ayatollah?" 
Tapper asked. 
El-Sayed largely sidestepped the question, insisting he didn't want to comment because of the "ridiculous pretext," instead putting focus on the three U.S. servicemembers who were killed by Iranian strikes in Jordan over the weekend. 
"Look, let's have a conversation based in Michigan. 
I'm running for Senate in Michigan. 
And I think here in Michigan, all of us are probably sad about the fact that we went to a war that we never should have fought. 
I'd rather our money be spent here," El-Sayed told Tapper. 
"I was specifically asking you about comments you didn't want to make because you didn't want to offend people in Dearborn, which is in Michigan," Tapper replied before moving on to another topic. 
SOCIALIST-BACKED DEM WHO RIPPED THE WEALTHY CRACKS STATE'S TOP 1%, TAX RETURNS SHOW 
In another contentious exchange earlier this month, El-Sayed clashed with CNN anchor Kasie Hunt about his deleted social media posts expressing support for defunding the police, accusing the network of seeking "clickbait" instead of focusing on the issues voters care about. 
El-Sayed, who has earned the endorsement of far-left progressives like Sen. 
Bernie Sanders , I-Vt., and Rep. 
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez , D-N.Y., is currently running in a combative Democratic primary against Michigan Rep. 
Haley Stevens. 
Both Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez joined him at Sunday's campaign rally. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.8%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.8%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic6.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 47.4%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect47.4%This article: 2.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion2.3%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.1%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 44.9%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias44.9%This article: 1.4%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias1.4%This article: 15.4%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error15.4%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 9.3%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem9.3%This article: 7.5%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man7.5%This article: 5.4%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority5.4%This article: 3.6%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma3.6%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 10.9%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization10.9%This article: 14.5%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring14.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.3%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion6.3%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof2.3%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.8%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote6.8%This article: 10.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection10.0%This article: 50.3%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice50.3%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 2.5%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

441 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers40%attributed speech264writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageAbdul El-Sayed • 30 words • 100.0% coverageAbdul El-Sayed • 21 words • 0.0% coverageAbdul El-Sayed • 1 words • 0.0% coverageAbdul El-Sayed • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 50 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageJake Tapper • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJake Tapper • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageAbdul El-Sayed • 8 words • 0.0% coverageAbdul El-Sayed • 6 words • 0.0% coverageAbdul El-Sayed • 27 words • 0.0% coverageAbdul El-Sayed • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJake Tapper • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Abdul El-Sayed

100%flagged-word coverage
132 attributed words75% of attributed speech88% writer coverage
0%42.5%85.0%Biased Writer Voice-84.1 ptsWriter: 84.1%Abdul El-Sayed: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+22.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Abdul El-Sayed: 22.7%22.7%Quote-first Misdirection+17.4 ptsWriter: 5.3%Abdul El-Sayed: 22.7%22.7%Politically Left Leaning B-4.2 ptsWriter: 4.2%Abdul El-Sayed: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.