Topic summary
⁠83%3 analyzed articles/videos1,230 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Campaigns results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 1,129 hits. Analysis detected 7,865 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,480 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,489 of 16,442 topics). This Election Campaigns is better (less manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group.
Election Campaigns
Topic details
Total words: 6,480
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510048.4% percentile
2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.4%15.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.6%10.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.1%9.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos