Keyword summary
39% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,628 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University Of Michigan results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 1,516 hits . Analysis detected 10,354 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,280 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (32,700 of 37,536 keywords). This University Of Michigan is better (less manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group. University Of Michigan
Keyword details
Total words: 13,280
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.0% 0.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst