Author summary
33% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,600 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vivian La results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 671 hits . Analysis detected 6,048 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,175 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 14% (5,418 of 6,244 authors). This Vivian La is better (less manipulative) than 86.80% of the peer group. Vivian La
Author details
Total words: 9,175
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.2% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.3% 7.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.4% 5.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst