Author summary
0%8 analyzed articles/videos4,175 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel Wolf results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 2,082 hits. Analysis detected 22,832 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,268 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,305 of 6,135 authors). This Rachel Wolf is better (less manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group.
Rachel Wolf
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
47%Rachel Wolf (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 19,268
Article count: 8
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

46% percentile
025507510046.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score8 analyzed articles19.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.0%9.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.8%10.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.2%8.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 8.6%8.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 7.0%7.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate