$400k shipment of live lobsters hijacked en route to Midwest Costco locations85%

By Rachel Wolf0%

12/25/2025, 5:36:58 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 31% saturation with 130 hits. Analysis detected 963 faulty-reasoning hits from 419 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 77.7% and a BS Rank of 85% (3,066 of 20,370 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 85.00% of the article peer group.

A $400,000 shipment of lobsters headed for Costco locations in Illinois and Minnesota was hijacked before arriving at its delivery points. 
Dylan Rexing, CEO of Indiana-based logistics business Rexing Companies, said the shipment was picked up in Taunton, Mass., but never reached its destination, WFLD reported. 
Rexing told the outlet that the heist appeared to be part of an organized ring of cargo thieves targeting high-value products. 
"This theft wasn't random. It followed a pattern we're seeing more and more, where criminals impersonate legitimate carriers using spoofed emails and burner phones to hijack high-value freight while it's in transit. 
For a mid-sized brokerage like ours, a $400,000 loss is significant. 
It forces tough decisions and ultimately drives up costs across the supply chain  costs consumers ultimately end up paying," Rexing told Fox Business. 
"Brokers are on the front lines of this problem, but we need federal agencies to have modern enforcement tools to keep pace with organized criminal networks." 
Until that happens, these thefts will continue to disrupt businesses and impact everyday prices," Rexing added. 
The FBI is investigating the lobster shipment theft. 
No arrests have been announced. 
Earlier this year, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) launched Operation Boiling Point with the goal of tackling organized retail crime. 
In its announcement of the operation, HSI stated that estimates show cargo theft accounts for $15–35 billion in annual losses. 
HSI said that organized theft groups often target cargo at ports of entry, truck stops, freight trains and in various places along the supply chain while goods are in transit. 
Additionally, HSI noted that while organized theft groups targeting cargo may not necessarily be involved in organized retail crime, "they can be linked to common fences/fencers that are purchasing the stolen goods." 
In September, the Department of Transportation issued a request for information seeking input from law enforcement, transportation agencies, freight carriers and other industry stakeholders, as well as the public, on how it can better protect the U.S. supply chain from cargo theft. 
"Cargo theft is a growing concern for the U.S. transportation system, costing the economy billions annually." 
These crimes involve opportunistic 'straight thefts' of trailers, containers, and loads at truck stops or multimodal distribution hubs and highly coordinated operations conducted by organized criminal networks. 
Both categories create significant economic losses, disrupt supply chains, and in some cases fund broader illicit activities such as narcotics trafficking, counterfeiting, and human smuggling," the DOT's request summary reads. 
FBI Minneapolis and Costco did not immediately respond to FOX Business' request for comment. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 13.6%Rachel Wolf: 3.2%FoxBusiness: 3.5%Anchoring Bias13.6%This article: 31.0%Rachel Wolf: 7.0%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Availability Heuristic31.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 20.3%Rachel Wolf: 4.3%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Confirmation Bias20.3%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 15.5%Rachel Wolf: 9.0%FoxBusiness: 13.0%Framing Effect15.5%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 1.4%FoxBusiness: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 3.0%FoxBusiness: 3.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 6.2%Rachel Wolf: 2.2%FoxBusiness: 1.7%In-Group Bias6.2%This article: 2.6%Rachel Wolf: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 1.5%Loss Aversion2.6%This article: 25.5%Rachel Wolf: 10.8%FoxBusiness: 7.8%Negativity Bias25.5%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 5.5%FoxBusiness: 8.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 3.1%FoxBusiness: 3.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 9.5%Rachel Wolf: 1.2%FoxBusiness: 2.0%Pessimism Bias9.5%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 1.7%FoxBusiness: 2.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 2.1%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 8.8%Rachel Wolf: 3.7%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Self-Serving Bias8.8%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 7.6%Rachel Wolf: 1.2%FoxBusiness: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.6%This article: 12.6%Rachel Wolf: 4.7%FoxBusiness: 2.4%Anecdotal12.6%This article: 25.5%Rachel Wolf: 8.6%FoxBusiness: 7.2%Appeal to Authority25.5%This article: 13.4%Rachel Wolf: 8.2%FoxBusiness: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion13.4%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 1.5%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.2%Rachel Wolf: 2.0%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Begging the Question6.2%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.8%Rachel Wolf: 1.2%FoxBusiness: 1.6%False Dilemma3.8%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.0%Rachel Wolf: 7.4%FoxBusiness: 6.3%Hasty Generalization5.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 0.3%FoxBusiness: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 5.7%Rachel Wolf: 2.7%FoxBusiness: 4.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.7%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Red Herring0.0%This article: 16.7%Rachel Wolf: 2.2%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Slippery Slope16.7%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Rachel Wolf: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%

419 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.