Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,885 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Supply Chain Disruptions results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 771 hits. Analysis detected 7,175 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,202 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (7,196 of 15,802 topics). This Supply Chain Disruptions is worse (more manipulative) than 54.50% of the peer group.
Supply Chain Disruptions
Topic details
Total words: 6,202
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.5% percentile
3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.0%4.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 8.3%8.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.9%9.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 8.0%8.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.9%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos