Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,298 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nikolas Lanum results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 1,427 hits . Analysis detected 12,964 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,986 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,281 of 6,164 authors). This Nikolas Lanum is better (less manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group. Nikolas Lanum
Author details
Total words: 12,986
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.8% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles13K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 7.4% 7.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.0%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Author 7.2%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst