Author summary
0% 9 analyzed articles/videos 5,516 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rachel del Guidice results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 2,942 hits . Analysis detected 33,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,605 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 59% (2,734 of 6,628 authors). This Rachel del Guidice is worse (more manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group. Rachel del Guidice
Author details
Total words: 21,605
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.8% percentile 3.0% BS Score9 analyzed articles21.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.6% 13.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.4% 12.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 7.6% 7.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.7% 11.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.0% 7.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.8% 11.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 5.3% 5.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst