“This is a big blow”: Trump uses Graham’s death to push SAVE America Act 34%

By Alex Galbraith75%

7/12/2026, 3:01:10 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 101 hits. Analysis detected 524 faulty-reasoning hits from 423 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 42.2% and a BS Rank of 34% (14,437 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the article peer group.

Even death can’t stop Donald Trump from thinking of people in terms of how useful they are to him. 
In a series of calls with Sunday morning press shows, the president used Sen. 
Lindsey Graham ‘s passing to stump for the SAVE America Act . 
The Republican senator from South Carolina died suddenly on Saturday, shortly after returning from a trip to Kyiv. 
Trump told NBC ‘s “Meet the Press” that he spoke to Graham on the phone mere hours before his passing. 
“He literally called me about the SAVE America Act,” he said. 
“He thought we were going to get it passed. 
This is a big blow to the SAVE America Act, let me tell you.” 
Graham was a co-sponsor of the president’s pet bill that would tighten requirements around voter identification in federal elections. 
The legislation has stalled for lack of sufficient support in the upper chamber of Congress. 
Related 
Lindsey Graham, from Trump critic to ally, dies at 71 
Though Graham spent years fighting against pressure to alter Senate rules and end the filibuster, Trump said that the late senator from South Carolina was coming around on the idea before his death. 
Speaking to CNN ‘s Jake Tapper, Trump said Graham was softening on his stance. 
“He was against terminating the filibuster,” Trump admitted. 
“We have a budget coming up. 
We have a debt ceiling coming up. 
The Democrats, well, they’re deranged in many ways. 
They’re not going to be able to do it. 
So, he was coming aboard, I think for the filibuster, terminating the filibuster.” 
Start your day with essential news from Salon. 
Sign up for our free morning newsletter , Crash Course. 
In both interviews, Trump used Graham’s death to avoid speaking about strikes on Iran and the possible closure of the Strait of Hormuz. 
“O ut of respect for Lindsey, I’m not talking about that,” Trump said. 
“These people, there’s something wrong with them. 
But I’m talking about a man who had nothing wrong with him, and that’s Lindsey Graham.” 
Watch Trump’s interview with  Meet the Press  below via YouTube : 
Read more 
about this topic 
“Stay tuned”: Graham promises “Cuba is next” in a global war against “bad guys” 
Lindsey Graham just triggered a MAGA revolt over Iran 
Lindsey Graham is the little war devil on Trump’s shoulder 
The post “This is a big blow”: Trump uses Graham’s death to push SAVE America Act appeared first on Salon.com . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.4%Alex Galbraith: 5.6%Salon: 5.2%Confirmation Bias5.4%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 1.0%Salon: 0.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Alex Galbraith: 2.0%Salon: 3.3%Availability Heuristic3.3%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.0%Salon: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 1.1%Salon: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 4.3%Salon: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 23.9%Alex Galbraith: 14.4%Salon: 7.3%Framing Effect23.9%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 1.2%Salon: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.2%Salon: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.0%Salon: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.1%Alex Galbraith: 1.0%Salon: 1.4%Optimism Bias3.1%This article: 2.1%Alex Galbraith: 4.0%Salon: 2.2%Pessimism Bias2.1%This article: 10.4%Alex Galbraith: 11.6%Salon: 11.0%Negativity Bias10.4%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 3.5%Salon: 0.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 4.5%Alex Galbraith: 1.3%Salon: 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error4.5%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.4%Salon: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Alex Galbraith: 2.2%Salon: 1.9%In-Group Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.8%Salon: 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.8%Alex Galbraith: 1.3%Salon: 2.4%Halo Effect3.8%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 1.0%Salon: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.3%Salon: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.2%Salon: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.3%Salon: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.0%Salon: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%Alex Galbraith: 2.3%Salon: 3.4%Ad Hominem8.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.3%Salon: 1.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 1.5%Salon: 3.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 1.2%Salon: 2.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 2.8%Salon: 1.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.6%Salon: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.1%Alex Galbraith: 7.5%Salon: 10.7%Hasty Generalization2.1%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 1.0%Salon: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.6%Salon: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.5%Alex Galbraith: 12.3%Salon: 5.9%Appeal to Emotion4.5%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 2.8%Salon: 1.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.4%Alex Galbraith: 2.0%Salon: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.4%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.7%Salon: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.9%Salon: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.0%Salon: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.0%Salon: 0.6%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.9%Salon: 2.7%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.0%Salon: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 1.3%Salon: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.0%Salon: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.0%Salon: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.0%Salon: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.3%Salon: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.0%Salon: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.0%Alex Galbraith: 1.4%Salon: 2.0%Unattributed Quote8.0%This article: 6.6%Alex Galbraith: 4.2%Salon: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection6.6%This article: 22.9%Alex Galbraith: 12.0%Salon: 15.2%Biased Writer Voice22.9%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 1.3%Salon: 2.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 6.4%Salon: 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Galbraith: 0.6%Salon: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.8%Alex Galbraith: 3.4%Salon: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…7.8%

423 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers37%attributed speech268writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 20 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 11 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageJake Tapper • 14 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 6 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jake Tapper

100%flagged-word coverage
14 attributed words9.0% of attributed speech61% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jake Tapper: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-36.2 ptsWriter: 36.2%Jake Tapper: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -12.3 ptsWriter: 12.3%Jake Tapper: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-10.4 ptsWriter: 10.4%Jake Tapper: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.