Sen. Lindsey Graham preliminary cause of death revealed - Los Angeles Times 10%

By Salvador Hernandez49%

7/12/2026, 4:22:38 PM

Keywords: The Latest

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 168 hits. Analysis detected 870 faulty-reasoning hits from 706 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 26.7% and a BS Rank of 10% (19,805 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.50% of the article peer group.

(Rainier Ehrhardt / Associated Press) 
By Salvador Hernandez 
July 12, 2026 4:22 PM PT 
Click here to listen to this article 
This is read by an automated voice. 
Please report any issues or inconsistencies here . 
See more from the L.A. 
Times in Google Search. 
Set us as preferred 
p]:text-cms-story-body-color-text" data-subscriber-content> 
Sen. 
Lindsey Graham, the prominent Republican from South Carolina who served in the Senate for more than two decades, died after suffering an aortic dissection, his office said Sunday. 
Graham died unexpectedly Saturday night, his office announced, shortly after he had returned to Washington after a trip to Ukraine. 
In a statement, his spokesperson said a preliminary report from the medical examiner for the District of Columbia found that the 71-year-old senator died of aortic dissection due to arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 
With aortic dissection, a tear occurs in the wall of the aorta. 
Sen. 
Lindsey Graham has died after a brief and unexpected illness, the South Carolina Republican’s office says in a statement 
According to the Mayo Clinic, aortic dissection is not very common, and its symptoms may be mistakenly attributed to other health conditions. 
It usually affects men in their 60s and 70s. 
If the blood from the dissection travels outside the artery, the condition is often fatal. 
A former military lawyer who reached the rank of colonel in the Air Force, Graham ran for the Republican nomination for president in 2016. 
Initially a cutting, vocal critic of then-candidate Donald Trump during the election, Graham became one of the president’s staunchest allies after Trump’s election. 
“Senator Lindsey Graham, one of the greatest people and Senators I have ever known, is dead!” 
Trump posted on his social media platform, Truth, on Sunday. 
“He was always working, and was a true American Patriot.” 
Graham was known as a C student in high school, and was the first member of his family to attend college. 
His mother died while he attended the University of South Carolina, and his father died of a heart attack during Graham’s first semester of law school. 
He served as a judge advocate in the Air Force, eventually becoming the chief prosecutor for the Air Force in Europe. 
He was first elected to serve as senator for South Carolina in November 2002. 
In a social media post on X, Vice President JD Vance described Graham as one of the most powerful lawmakers, and recalled an incident where he and Graham got into a shouting match over a funding bill for the war in Ukraine. 
Later the same day, he wrote in the post, Graham was advocating for rail legislation that Vance supported. 
“That was Lindsey Graham,” he wrote . 
“He fought like hell for the things he believed in, and he was just as willing to go to bat for you when it counted.” 
Graham had been scheduled to appear on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday to discuss his trip to Ukraine. 
Instead, President Trump appeared in his stead, where he said the senator had been “like a member of the family.” 
Trump called into several Sunday news programs to discuss Graham’s death, and said he had spoken to Graham on Saturday evening. 
Trump told CNN’s Jake Tapper that the South Carolina senator had said he was “tired.” 
Politics World & Nation The Latest 
Deeply reported insights into legislation, politics and policy from Sacramento, Washington and beyond. 
In your inbox twice per week. 
By continuing, you agree to our Terms of Service , which include arbitration and a class action waiver. 
You agree that we and our third-party vendors may collect and use your information, including through cookies, pixels and similar technologies, for the purposes set forth in our Privacy Policy such as personalizing your experience and ads. 
Salvador Hernandez is a reporter on the Fast Break Desk, the Los Angeles Times’ breaking news team. 
Before joining the newsroom in 2022, he was a senior reporter for BuzzFeed News, where he covered criminal justice issues, the growing militia movement and breaking news. 
He also covered crime as a reporter at the Orange County Register. 
He is a Los Angeles native. 
More From the Los Angeles Times 
Most Read in Politics 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 2.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Salvador Hernandez: 4.6%Daily Pilot: 3.5%Availability Heuristic3.0%This article: 1.3%Salvador Hernandez: 0.7%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic1.3%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 9.5%Salvador Hernandez: 3.7%Daily Pilot: 7.5%Framing Effect9.5%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.5%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 2.0%Daily Pilot: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Salvador Hernandez: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 1.4%Pessimism Bias3.7%This article: 12.9%Salvador Hernandez: 6.0%Daily Pilot: 7.8%Negativity Bias12.9%This article: 1.0%Salvador Hernandez: 1.1%Daily Pilot: 2.2%Self-Serving Bias1.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 1.5%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.5%Salvador Hernandez: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 1.6%In-Group Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 23.8%Salvador Hernandez: 4.9%Daily Pilot: 5.1%Halo Effect23.8%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.3%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Primacy Effect3.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.5%Salvador Hernandez: 5.1%Daily Pilot: 4.9%Appeal to Authority9.5%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.9%Daily Pilot: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 3.2%Daily Pilot: 4.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.6%Salvador Hernandez: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 1.0%Bandwagon0.6%This article: 7.2%Salvador Hernandez: 6.1%Daily Pilot: 5.7%Appeal to Emotion7.2%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.4%Daily Pilot: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.0%Salvador Hernandez: 1.8%Daily Pilot: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.9%Salvador Hernandez: 4.3%Daily Pilot: 2.8%Anecdotal8.9%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.1%Salvador Hernandez: 1.4%Daily Pilot: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.1%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.2%Daily Pilot: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.1%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.2%Salvador Hernandez: 2.1%Daily Pilot: 1.3%Unattributed Quote6.2%This article: 2.3%Salvador Hernandez: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection2.3%This article: 1.7%Salvador Hernandez: 1.3%Daily Pilot: 6.0%Biased Writer Voice1.7%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.8%Daily Pilot: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Salvador Hernandez: 0.0%Daily Pilot: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 15.2%Salvador Hernandez: 1.0%Daily Pilot: 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…15.2%

706 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers49%attributed speech363writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageLos Angeles Times • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageLindsey Graham • 28 words • 100.0% coverageLindsey Graham • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageSouth Carolina Republican’s office • 19 words • 0.0% coverageMayo Clinic • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageLindsey Graham • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 16 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageLindsey Graham • 21 words • 0.0% coverageLindsey Graham • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJD Vance • 42 words • 0.0% coverageJD Vance • 18 words • 0.0% coverageJD Vance • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJD Vance • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 20 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJake Tapper • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

JD Vance

100%flagged-word coverage
92 attributed words27% of attributed speech75% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -29.5 ptsWriter: 29.5%JD Vance: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-3.3 ptsWriter: 3.3%JD Vance: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.