Breitbart81%

Platner Accuser: ‘I Really Agree with His Politics’, That’s One Reason ‘I Didn’t Come Out’ 22%

By Ian Hanchett73%

7/7/2026, 10:21:06 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Pessimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 692 faulty-reasoning hits from 491 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.3% and a BS Rank of 22% (17,272 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 78.90% of the article peer group.

During an interview aired on Monday’s broadcast of CNN’s “The Lead,” Jenny Racicot, who is accusing Democratic U.S. 
Senate candidate Graham Platner of rape, said that “I really agree with his politics. 
I think we need somebody with those political stances and who are willing to do the work. 
And I see his political videos. 
They get me fired up as well. 
I understand why people want someone like him in office.” 
And that is one reason she was reluctant to come forward. 
Host Jake Tapper asked, “There are going to be people, maybe even his campaign, certainly his supporters, who say this is politically motivated. 
What would you say to that?” 
Racicot answered, “I couldn’t disagree more. 
That was actually one of the reasons that I didn’t come out.” 
Tapper then cut in to ask, “Because you agree with his politics?” 
Racicot answered, “I do. 
I really agree with his politics. 
I think we need somebody with those political stances and who are willing to do the work. 
And I see his political videos. 
They get me fired up as well. 
I understand why people want someone like him in office. 
And I felt like me coming forward would essentially, potentially, take that away. 
And I felt really uncomfortable with the responsibility of and the weight of my story and what that might do.” 
Tapper then asked, “When people hear this from you, are you saying you should not vote for him because of what happened?” 
Racicot responded, “I’m not going to go as far as to say that. 
I’m just here to tell my story, to give a clearer picture of who he is and the type of past that he has. 
And I just think it’s fair to the democratic process to let people know who they’re voting for.” 
Later, Tapper asked, “There are going to be Democrats who say, I believe you, but I don’t care, I’m going to vote for him anyway, because we need a progressive voice in the United States Senate. 
Are you going to be okay with it? 
Are you going to be able to handle that? 
I’m not saying it’s the right answer or the right response, but –.” 
Racicot cut in to answer, “No, I have friends who feel that way, and that’s been a hard pill to swallow. 
And I guess I need to not ask, potentially. 
Maybe I need to not ask in order to not care what they do. 
I understand. 
I understand that the state of our political environment is so much so that we need a lot of change, and he’s offering that change. 
And I’m not mad at anyone who has voted for him all along. 
If he wasn’t who he was, I would be voting for him as well. 
And, going forward, I don’t know what’s going to happen.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.1%Ian Hanchett: 4.5%Breitbart: 4.5%Confirmation Bias5.1%This article: 2.4%Ian Hanchett: 0.7%Breitbart: 0.6%Anchoring Bias2.4%This article: 5.7%Ian Hanchett: 2.8%Breitbart: 3.9%Availability Heuristic5.7%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.6%Breitbart: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 13.5%Breitbart: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Ian Hanchett: 11.0%Breitbart: 11.9%Framing Effect3.1%This article: 2.6%Ian Hanchett: 0.8%Breitbart: 0.3%Loss Aversion2.6%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.5%Ian Hanchett: 1.5%Breitbart: 3.6%Optimism Bias6.5%This article: 9.0%Ian Hanchett: 3.0%Breitbart: 1.7%Pessimism Bias9.0%This article: 7.3%Ian Hanchett: 7.7%Breitbart: 9.7%Negativity Bias7.3%This article: 2.9%Ian Hanchett: 2.1%Breitbart: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias2.9%This article: 4.9%Ian Hanchett: 0.7%Breitbart: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error4.9%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Ian Hanchett: 6.0%Breitbart: 4.7%In-Group Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 4.2%Breitbart: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Ian Hanchett: 0.4%Breitbart: 3.1%Halo Effect5.1%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.2%Breitbart: 1.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.8%Breitbart: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 3.3%Breitbart: 2.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 7.3%Ian Hanchett: 4.3%Breitbart: 1.4%Straw Man7.3%This article: 3.7%Ian Hanchett: 3.7%Breitbart: 4.2%Appeal to Authority3.7%This article: 6.9%Ian Hanchett: 8.5%Breitbart: 2.5%False Dilemma6.9%This article: 5.5%Ian Hanchett: 2.0%Breitbart: 1.3%Slippery Slope5.5%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.9%Breitbart: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.4%Ian Hanchett: 11.4%Breitbart: 7.9%Hasty Generalization11.4%This article: 4.7%Ian Hanchett: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.6%Red Herring4.7%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.7%Breitbart: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.0%Ian Hanchett: 15.1%Breitbart: 8.8%Appeal to Emotion9.0%This article: 9.4%Ian Hanchett: 3.0%Breitbart: 1.8%Begging the Question9.4%This article: 2.2%Ian Hanchett: 1.0%Breitbart: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)2.2%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.0%Breitbart: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.3%Ian Hanchett: 2.0%Breitbart: 2.5%Anecdotal4.3%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.6%Breitbart: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.5%Ian Hanchett: 3.8%Breitbart: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.5%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.6%Ian Hanchett: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.1%Middle Ground2.6%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.3%Breitbart: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.9%Ian Hanchett: 3.2%Breitbart: 2.8%Unattributed Quote2.9%This article: 3.1%Ian Hanchett: 3.1%Breitbart: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection3.1%This article: 2.2%Ian Hanchett: 3.8%Breitbart: 7.8%Biased Writer Voice2.2%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 2.0%Breitbart: 1.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 5.1%Breitbart: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 1.2%Breitbart: 7.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ian Hanchett: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

491 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker26%attributed speech362writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageJake Tapper • 23 words • 0.0% coverageJake Tapper • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJake Tapper • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageJake Tapper • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageJake Tapper • 36 words • 0.0% coverageJake Tapper • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJake Tapper • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJake Tapper • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jake Tapper

95%flagged-word coverage
129 attributed words100% of attributed speech68% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Quote-first Misdirection-4.1 ptsWriter: 4.1%Jake Tapper: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-3.9 ptsWriter: 3.9%Jake Tapper: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-3.0 ptsWriter: 3.0%Jake Tapper: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.