Speaker summary
69% 17 analyzed articles/videos 810.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Human Rights Watch results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Negativity Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 177.534 hits . Analysis detected 2,013.312 faulty-reasoning hits from 810.667 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 5% (27,171 of 28,364 speakers). This Human Rights Watch is better (less manipulative) than 95.80% of the peer group. Human Rights Watch
Speaker details
Total words: 810.667
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.2% percentile 6.2% BS Score17 analyzed videos810.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 16.1% 16.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 19.9% 19.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 17.0% 17.0% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 15.7% 15.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Loss Aversion: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 2.5% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 7.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 2.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.4% Begging the Question: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst