Author summary
0% 12 analyzed articles/videos 6,847 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna Boiko-Weyrauch results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 2,118 hits . Analysis detected 21,747 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,684 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 17% (5,291 of 6,316 authors). This Anna Boiko-Weyrauch is better (less manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group. Anna Boiko-Weyrauch
Author details
Total words: 28,684
Article count: 11
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.2% percentile 1.6% BS Score11 analyzed articles28.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst