Speaker summary
52% 18 analyzed articles/videos 1,122.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These George Washington results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Slippery Slope , and False Dilemma , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 261.755 hits . Analysis detected 2,001.132 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,122.667 analyzed words across 18 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 4% (26,946 of 27,820 speakers). This George Washington is better (less manipulative) than 96.90% of the peer group. George Washington
Speaker details
Total words: 1,122.667
Content count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.1% percentile 5.5% BS Score18 analyzed videos1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 0.1% 0.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 15.3% 15.3% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 13.3% 13.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 18.9% 18.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 0.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 11.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Primacy Effect: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 3.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst