Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Daniel Horowitz results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Indoctrination , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 1,725 hits . Analysis detected 10,660 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,806 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Daniel Horowitz is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Daniel Horowitz
Author details
Total words: 7,806
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 18.1% 18.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 16.5% 16.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 22.1% 22.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 18.1% 18.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 22.1%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 18.1%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Author 18.1%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Author 16.5%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst