Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,001 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Nicholas results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 399 hits . Analysis detected 3,423 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,004 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,329 of 6,629 authors). This Peter Nicholas is better (less manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group. Peter Nicholas
Author details
Total words: 4,004
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.8% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.3% 3.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 10.0% 10.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Middle Ground: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst