NBC News35%

Trump warns of communist ‘threat’ and touts America’s strength at Mount Rushmore 43%

By Peter Nicholas0%

7/3/2026, 10:02:22 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Primacy Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 148 hits. Analysis detected 1,620 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,001 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46.5% and a BS Rank of 43% (12,605 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 57.60% of the article peer group.

KEYSTONE, S.D.  On the eve of the 250th anniversary of America’s independence, President Donald Trump spoke at Mt. 
Rushmore Friday night and warned that the nation is under threat from a “communist menace.” 
Trump’s half-hour address beneath the faces of four towering predecessors coupled patriotic messages about American power and greatness with a vow to crush a “communist” movement he said is resurgent. 
“You can be loyal to Karl Marx or you can be loyal to America. 
You can be a communist or you can be a patriot. 
You cannot be both,” Trump said. 
Trump did not identify the political figures he sees as a communist vanguard, though in recent days, he has depicted the democratic socialists who won primary races in New York as leftists bent on destroying American traditions. 
He called communism “a mortal threat to American liberty,” akin to 9/11, “the enemy of the Constitution,” “the enemy of July 4, 1776,” and “the enemy” in general. 
“So on the eve of this 250th anniversary of American heritage, we resolve and swear for all to hear that the citizens of the United States of America will vanquish communism quickly,” Trump said, adding: “Don’t let them take too much of your time.” 
Hail and rain disrupted the pre-program at Mt. 
Rushmore, forcing guests to find shelter, but the skies cleared ahead of Trump’s appearance. 
He arrived with a theatrical flair, as Air Force One flew directly behind the heads of George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt. 
“We come to this beautiful mountain  and it is beautiful  to express our gratitude to those who made it possible, starting with the four men most responsible for reaching this milestone, more than any others,” he said, in reference to the illuminated faces overhead. 
After Trump spoke, the thousands of people who had won a lottery to get into the event stayed for a fireworks display over the granite faces of the four former presidents. 
Trump made no mention of adding a fifth face to Mt. 
Rushmore -- his own. 
Back in his first term, then-Rep. 
Kristi Noem of South Dakota said he told her his “dream” was to join his celebrated predecessors atop Mount Rushmore. 
“I started laughing,” Noem, a Republican who was Trump’s homeland security secretary this term, said in 2018. 
“He wasn’t laughing, so he was totally serious.” 
He had to settle. 
As South Dakota governor in 2020, Noem gave Trump a 4-foot-high model of Mount Rushmore that included his image. 
That year, news outlets reported that Trump White House aides had inquired about adding faces to the monument. 
Trump denied it, though he said on social media that “based on all of the many things accomplished during the first 3 1/2 years, perhaps more than any other Presidency, sounds like a good idea to me!” 
For a face to be added to Mount Rushmore, Congress would have to approve, but the practical reality is that the mountain can’t handle one. 
It lacks enough rock to sculpt another face. 
That was evident early on. 
The sculpture was built from 1927 to 1941. 
During construction, lead sculptor Gutzon Borglum wrote that the “stone limitations are so serious, that I doubt if it would be possible to change the composition, which is fixed, in any way to include a fifth head.” 
Greeting visitors at the monument before the celebration began, Sen. 
Mike Rounds, R-S.D., said in an interview, “Unfortunately, we actually looked at Ronald Reagan, as well, and the problem is the geologists we’ve talked to tell us there’s simply no good rock on the mountain.” 
Hope still lingers. 
A week after he was sworn in last year, one of his allies, Rep. 
Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., introduced a bill calling for Trump’s likeness to be carved on the mountain. 
The bill went nowhere; it never advanced out of the House Natural Resources Committee. 
Luna has since found new ways to celebrate Trump. 
In October, she nominated him for a Nobel Peace Prize, an accolade that has also been on his mind. 
Her office didn’t reply to a request for comment. 
Trump made a brief mention of the Nobel Prize in his speech on Friday. 
Noting that Americans have won the most Nobel prizes, he said, ruefully: “Well, they haven’t given me one.” 
South Dakota Gov. 
Larry Rhoden, a Republican, said in a statement Friday, “There’s supposedly not enough room up there to add another face, but if they were able to find some extra space to add someone, I think presidents Trump or Reagan would be good candidates!” 
Rounds, though, was noncommittal. 
“I think America decides those things,” he said. 
A running theme of Trump’s second term is how he’ll be remembered. 
He has one idea, his detractors have another, and the courts have emerged as the referee. 
A Kennedy Center board populated by Trump loyalists added his name to the building, but a federal judge ordered it struck off. 
The Trump administration chiseled his name onto the U.S. 
Institute of Peace Building in Washington. 
That one remains. 
One of Trump’s supporters, who won a special lottery to attend the Independence Day event at Mount Rushmore, said Trump has earned a place on the mountaintop. 
Wearing a MAGA hat as he sat in the cafeteria at the site, Mike Pack, 74, of Oregon, said: “He’s the greatest president we’ve had in my lifetime. 
I like that he’s trying to get everybody together and unite everybody.” 
A pair of George Washington and Abraham Lincoln impersonators strolling the grounds considered whether they should share company above with Trump. 
In appropriate costume, each said he’d like to see the monument preserved intact. 
“I think they’ve captured the necessary elements, and any changes might create more trouble than it’s worth,” Lincoln said in an interview. 
“And I wholeheartedly concur with my able co-agitator across time, Mr. 
Lincoln,” said Washington. 
“I think things as they stand are just fine.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 0.0%NBC News: 2.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 0.0%NBC News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%Peter Nicholas: 1.8%NBC News: 2.9%Availability Heuristic7.4%This article: 3.7%Peter Nicholas: 0.9%NBC News: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic3.7%This article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 0.0%NBC News: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.5%Peter Nicholas: 1.9%NBC News: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias0.5%This article: 14.8%Peter Nicholas: 7.2%NBC News: 6.4%Framing Effect14.8%This article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 0.0%NBC News: 0.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 7.2%Peter Nicholas: 3.2%NBC News: 0.3%Status Quo Bias7.2%This article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.1%Peter Nicholas: 3.2%NBC News: 1.8%Optimism Bias6.1%This article: 2.6%Peter Nicholas: 0.6%NBC News: 1.2%Pessimism Bias2.6%This article: 11.3%Peter Nicholas: 3.9%NBC News: 7.0%Negativity Bias11.3%This article: 8.7%Peter Nicholas: 4.9%NBC News: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias8.7%This article: 0.8%Peter Nicholas: 0.2%NBC News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.8%This article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.9%Peter Nicholas: 10.0%NBC News: 1.5%In-Group Bias7.9%This article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 1.7%NBC News: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Peter Nicholas: 5.1%NBC News: 4.0%Halo Effect6.7%This article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 0.0%NBC News: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 0.0%NBC News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.1%Peter Nicholas: 1.5%NBC News: 1.3%Recency Bias3.1%This article: 11.3%Peter Nicholas: 2.8%NBC News: 0.5%Primacy Effect11.3%This article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 0.0%NBC News: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 0.0%NBC News: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 0.9%NBC News: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.7%Peter Nicholas: 2.9%NBC News: 3.2%Appeal to Authority11.7%This article: 3.1%Peter Nicholas: 3.1%NBC News: 1.2%False Dilemma3.1%This article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 1.6%NBC News: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 3.7%Peter Nicholas: 0.9%NBC News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning3.7%This article: 8.7%Peter Nicholas: 4.7%NBC News: 3.2%Hasty Generalization8.7%This article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 0.0%NBC News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.1%Peter Nicholas: 0.3%NBC News: 0.7%Bandwagon1.1%This article: 8.4%Peter Nicholas: 8.3%NBC News: 4.9%Appeal to Emotion8.4%This article: 4.4%Peter Nicholas: 1.1%NBC News: 0.8%Begging the Question4.4%This article: 0.4%Peter Nicholas: 0.1%NBC News: 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.4%This article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 0.0%NBC News: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 0.0%NBC News: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.4%Peter Nicholas: 3.0%NBC News: 1.5%Anecdotal7.4%This article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.8%Peter Nicholas: 0.7%NBC News: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.8%This article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 0.0%NBC News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.1%Peter Nicholas: 2.0%NBC News: 0.1%Middle Ground8.1%This article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 2.5%Peter Nicholas: 1.7%NBC News: 0.1%Special Pleading2.5%This article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 0.0%NBC News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.8%Peter Nicholas: 0.4%NBC News: 1.8%Unattributed Quote1.8%This article: 1.4%Peter Nicholas: 0.7%NBC News: 1.3%Quote-first Misdirection1.4%This article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 0.6%NBC News: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 4.4%Peter Nicholas: 3.3%NBC News: 1.1%Indoctrination4.4%This article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 0.0%NBC News: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 0.0%NBC News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Peter Nicholas: 0.0%NBC News: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1001 words analyzed.

Speakers

8speakers43%attributed speech572writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 14 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 11 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageKristi Noem • 20 words • 0.0% coverageKristi Noem • 17 words • 0.0% coverageKristi Noem • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageGutzon Borglum • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageMike Rounds • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Rhoden • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageMike Rounds • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageMike Pack • 28 words • 0.0% coverageMike Pack • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageAbraham Lincoln • 22 words • 0.0% coverageAbraham Lincoln • 11 words • 0.0% coverageGeorge Washington • 3 words • 0.0% coverageGeorge Washington • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
176 attributed words41% of attributed speech63% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Indoctrination+25.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 25.0%25.0%Quote-first Misdirection+8.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Donald Trump: 8.0%8.0%Unattributed Quote-3.1 ptsWriter: 3.1%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.