Texas Brings the Bible Back into Schools 59%

By Carole Hornsby Haynes0%

7/5/2026, 12:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 36 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 253 hits. Analysis detected 2,377 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,027 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 55.5% and a BS Rank of 59% (8,556 of 20,498 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 58.30% of the article peer group.

In the 1963 landmark decision Abington School District v. 
Schempp, the U.S. 
Supreme Court banished Bible reading and prayer in public classrooms, ending a practice that had been commonplace since the nation’s founding. 
With the State Board of Education (SBOE)’s approval of a sweeping K–12 state required literature list, Texas has now returned the Bible to the classroom. 
Though teachers typically make the decision about what students read, based on a state list of suggested book titles, Texas leads the nation in issuing an established literary canon. 
The SBOE has included important literary texts of around 200 Bible passages, essays, and books designed to integrate with historical events that students are studying in social studies. 
Since Texas educates approximately one in 10 of the nation’s public school students, this is transformational. 
Critics claim that the selections from the Bible violate the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause, which prevents the government from establishing an official, state-sponsored religion. 
But federal law allows public schools to teach the Bible objectively as a part of secular history, culture, or a literature curriculum. 
Critic Northrup Frye said, “A student of English literature who does not know the Bible does not understand a good deal of what is going on in what he reads.” 
It is essential for students to understand biblical stories when analyzing Western literature because the Bible is a pillar of Western civilization. 
Passages, moral frameworks, and narrative structures have informed the classical literary canon since antiquity. 
Some of the greatest classics draw their plots, characters, and ideas mainly from the Bible. 
Two of the most notable examples are Dante’s Divine Comedy and Milton’s Paradise Lost. 
The Divine Comedy merged the biblical story of the afterlife with the formal structure of classical epic poetry to create a motif. 
The definitive English epic poem, Paradise Lost, traces the biblical Fall of Man from Genesis, merging Hebraic theology with classical Greco-Roman epic structures. 
Hundreds of references to the Bible are found in Shakespeare’s plays, with the Book of Psalms, Genesis, and the Gospel of Matthew quoted or referenced most often. 
Modern major American figures such as William Faulkner and Flannery O’Connor continued to use biblical themes in their works. 
The Great Gatsby, the famous novel by F. 
Scott Fitzgerald, makes many clever allusions to the Bible. 
Justice Potter Stewart, the only dissenter in the 1963 Abington decision, warned that the ruling did not protect freedom of religion, but rather established “a religion of secularism.” 
His prediction was correct. 
The spiritual foundation anchoring American public life had been severed, and moral clarity steadily declined. 
With the Bible banned in public schools, students no longer learned the Ten Commandments. 
The story of creation was replaced by the story of evolution. 
God could not be mentioned in textbooks. 
Prayer was no longer allowed in schools. 
The teaching of radical sex and far-left indoctrination replaced academic learning. 
Student mental health is in a crisis. 
Social emotional learning (SEL) is purported to improve student mental health. 
Instead, SEL has become the vehicle for intertwining Marxist indoctrination in the curriculum, which has created unstable, anti-American youths. 
A superior alternative to SEL, the Texas literature selections are packed with life stories. 
* Parable of the Prodigal Son: Unconditional love, forgiveness, and redemption. 
* Eight Beatitudes (Matthew 5: 1–12): Humility, kindness, mercy, helping others, true strength comes from inner character. 
* David and Goliath: With faith, courage, and determination, we can overcome great odds. 
* Book of Lamentations and Book of Job: Endurance and the renewal of hope. 
* The Good Samaritan: Help those in need regardless of religion, status, or race. 
* Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount: Christian discipleship, forgiveness, humility, and love for friends and enemies. 
* The Rime of the Ancient Mariner: Centers on themes of love, forgiveness, penance, and blessing. 
* Beowulf: An epic pagan story, retold through a Christian lens, teaches that God is ruler of all things and evil is a curse. 
* Pride and Prejudice: First impressions are not indicative of someone’s true character. 
Critics of the literature list generally do not want religion included in the selections. 
If religion is included, they want passages from other faiths (such as the Quran or the Book of Mormon) to be included. 
Yet it was the Bible that shaped America as a nation from the beginning. 
In 1620, Pilgrims landed at Plymouth carrying a vision of a “city upon a hill,” a phrase borrowed from Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount. 
The colonists believed they were in a covenant with God like that of the Israelites in the Old Testament. 
This biblical worldview informed the founding of the United States. 
The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were written with an understanding that liberty and governance rest on moral principles derived from Scripture. 
John Adams, the second president, believed that the Bible’s teachings are essential for a free and virtuous society. 
George Washington, in his Farewell Address, warned that national morality could not prevail without religion. 
To Washington, that principle was biblical. 
Other founders, including Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson, though diverse in their beliefs, shared a conviction that the Bible was indispensable to the American experiment. 
Texas students will read the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. 
Constitution and learn about their biblical foundations. 
Thomas Jefferson wrote, “If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.” 
The literacy rate of our early Republic was the highest in the world. 
Today, only 13 percent of eighth-grade students are proficient in American history. 
Only 30 percent of eighth-graders are proficient in reading. 
Public classrooms have become government indoctrination centers rather than institutions of academic learning. 
With an extensive required reading list for each grade level, Texas classrooms will return to reading great classics from Western literature and learn how the Bible shaped America’s founding. 
For nearly 200 years, the Bible was not just a religious text; it was the bedrock of American identity, education, and governance. 
Now the Bible is returning to the classroom, beginning in Texas. 
Carole Hornsby Haynes, education policy/curriculum advisor, historian, classical pianist. carole.hornsby.haynes@gmail.com 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.8%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 10.5%American Thinker: 10.4%Confirmation Bias9.8%This article: 2.3%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.6%American Thinker: 0.7%Anchoring Bias2.3%This article: 5.6%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 1.4%American Thinker: 3.8%Availability Heuristic5.6%This article: 8.4%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 2.1%American Thinker: 1.6%Representativeness Heuristic8.4%This article: 0.4%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.2%American Thinker: 1.3%Hindsight Bias0.4%This article: 4.5%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 3.3%American Thinker: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias4.5%This article: 13.4%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 12.3%American Thinker: 7.0%Framing Effect13.4%This article: 1.1%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.3%American Thinker: 0.6%Loss Aversion1.1%This article: 0.7%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.2%American Thinker: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.7%This article: 0.0%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.9%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 1.8%American Thinker: 1.6%Optimism Bias2.9%This article: 4.9%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 2.5%American Thinker: 2.6%Pessimism Bias4.9%This article: 18.1%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 8.4%American Thinker: 13.2%Negativity Bias18.1%This article: 1.8%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.5%American Thinker: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias1.8%This article: 0.0%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.0%American Thinker: 3.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.9%American Thinker: 4.0%In-Group Bias3.5%This article: 3.5%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.9%American Thinker: 5.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.5%This article: 9.3%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 2.3%American Thinker: 2.7%Halo Effect9.3%This article: 0.0%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.9%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.5%American Thinker: 1.3%Recency Bias1.9%This article: 2.8%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.7%American Thinker: 0.7%Primacy Effect2.8%This article: 0.0%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.0%American Thinker: 5.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 2.1%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 2.8%American Thinker: 4.2%Straw Man2.1%This article: 16.7%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 6.9%American Thinker: 4.7%Appeal to Authority16.7%This article: 5.3%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 3.0%American Thinker: 4.7%False Dilemma5.3%This article: 2.9%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 1.5%American Thinker: 3.3%Slippery Slope2.9%This article: 0.0%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 24.6%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 20.7%American Thinker: 17.2%Hasty Generalization24.6%This article: 0.0%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.8%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.7%American Thinker: 0.5%Bandwagon2.8%This article: 4.6%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 1.5%American Thinker: 8.6%Appeal to Emotion4.6%This article: 2.8%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 1.2%American Thinker: 2.7%Begging the Question2.8%This article: 15.0%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 5.5%American Thinker: 3.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)15.0%This article: 0.0%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 7.0%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 1.8%American Thinker: 1.7%Burden of Proof7.0%This article: 2.3%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.6%American Thinker: 0.6%Appeal to Nature2.3%This article: 0.0%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.8%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.9%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 1.0%American Thinker: 3.7%Anecdotal3.9%This article: 0.0%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.5%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.2%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 1.0%American Thinker: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.2%This article: 0.0%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.8%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 1.2%American Thinker: 3.1%Unattributed Quote4.8%This article: 8.2%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 2.8%American Thinker: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection8.2%This article: 3.7%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 6.2%American Thinker: 23.5%Biased Writer Voice3.7%This article: 24.3%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 9.9%American Thinker: 5.7%Indoctrination24.3%This article: 0.0%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 6.1%American Thinker: 15.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%Carole Hornsby Haynes: 0.3%American Thinker: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.1%

1027 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers8.2%attributed speech943writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageNorthrup Frye • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJustice Potter Stewart • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageThomas Jefferson • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
28 attributed words33% of attributed speech90% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Justice Potter Stewart: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination-26.5 ptsWriter: 26.5%Justice Potter Stewart: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-5.2 ptsWriter: 5.2%Justice Potter Stewart: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-4.0 ptsWriter: 4.0%Justice Potter Stewart: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.2 ptsWriter: 1.2%Justice Potter Stewart: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.