Keyword summary
38% 17 analyzed articles/videos 12,577 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Literature results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 5,899 hits . Analysis detected 59,186 faulty-reasoning hits from 63,890 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (29,424 of 34,832 keywords). This Literature is better (less manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group. Literature
Keyword details
Total words: 63,890
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score17 analyzed articles63.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst