Author summary
84%3 analyzed articles/videos3,758 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Crowley results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 1,603 hits. Analysis detected 13,068 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,986 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 36% (4,261 of 6,629 authors). This Michael Crowley is better (less manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group.
Michael Crowley
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
36%Michael Crowley (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,986
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

36% percentile
025507510035.7% percentile
2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles13K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.7%8.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.3%12.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.9%5.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos