Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video350 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nathaniel Rich results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 199 hits. Analysis detected 663 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (2,679 of 6,498 authors). This Nathaniel Rich is worse (more manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group.
Nathaniel Rich
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠59%Nathaniel Rich (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,400
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

59% percentile
025507510058.8% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 14.2%14.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 5.1%5.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 3.1%3.1%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 14.2%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%No True Scotsman: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos