Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,027 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carole Hornsby Haynes results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Indoctrination, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 852 hits. Analysis detected 5,081 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,255 of 6,628 authors). This Carole Hornsby Haynes is worse (more manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group.
Carole Hornsby Haynes
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
66%Carole Hornsby Haynes (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,108
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

66% percentile
025507510066.0% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.3%12.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 20.7%20.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.4%8.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 9.9%9.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 6.1%6.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 12.3%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 20.7%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Author 9.9%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos