Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video42 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justice Potter Stewart results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 129.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 42 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 68.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (5,716 of 26,899 speakers). This Justice Potter Stewart is worse (more manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group.
Justice Potter Stewart
Speaker details
Total words: 42
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510078.8% percentile
68.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos42 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos