Author summary
63% 1 analyzed article/video 2,395 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eileen Jones results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 2,764 hits . Analysis detected 11,564 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,580 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,860 of 6,365 authors). This Eileen Jones is worse (more manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group. Eileen Jones
Author details
Total words: 9,580
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.1% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 28.9% 28.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 25.1% 25.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 28.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 25.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Author 6.2%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst