Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,402 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Mott results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Appeal to Authority , and Slippery Slope , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 588 hits . Analysis detected 6,306 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,067 of 6,359 authors). This Christopher Mott is worse (more manipulative) than 51.80% of the peer group. Christopher Mott
Author details
Total words: 5,608
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.8% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.1% 9.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.5% 10.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Author 6.5% 6.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Author 9.1%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Slippery Slope: Author 6.5%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 5.2%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst