Speaker summary
51% 8 analyzed articles/videos 543.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gary Peters results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 115.642 hits . Analysis detected 1,217.044 faulty-reasoning hits from 543.667 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,800 of 28,364 speakers). This Gary Peters is better (less manipulative) than 98.00% of the peer group. Gary Peters
Speaker details
Total words: 543.667
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.0% percentile 4.5% BS Score8 analyzed videos543.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 10.0% 10.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.7% 1.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 15.3% 15.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 0.8% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 3.1% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst