BS Summary: This article contains 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, False Dilemma, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 32.5% saturation with 215 hits. Analysis detected 1,890 faulty-reasoning hits from 662 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 55.4% and a BS Rank of 59% (9,021 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 58.80% of the article peer group.

In 2025, Elissa Slotkin, a Democratic U.S. senator from Michigan, observed the following about her political party: “We’re like a solar system with no sun. 
We don’t act as a team, and when we don’t work as a team, we turn our guns on each other, and it’s so, so, so, fruitless.” 
Fast-forward to now, and the Democratic Party seems to be moving in a distinct direction: far left. 
Like, socialist left. 
From New York to Colorado, newcomer democratic socialists have unseated sitting members of Congress. 
But these victories, so far, have come in solidly leftist strongholds. 
What I’m watching closely is whether a far-left progressive can win in my state of Michigan, a battleground state that helped elect President Donald Trump in both 2016 and 2024. 
The Democratic Senate primary here is Aug. 4, and it’s caught the attention of the country because control of the Senate could be decided in the Great Lakes State. 
Democratic Sen. 
Gary Peters isn’t running for reelection, giving Republicans a chance to win the seat back. 
Democrats must flip four seats to take control of the chamber, and holding Michigan is essential to that math. 
But El-Sayed may face bigger challenges if he makes it to the November election. 
He’ll face off against Republican Mike Rogers, a former congressman who narrowly lost his 2024 Senate bid to Slotkin. 
Michigan hasn’t elected a Republican to the Senate in more than 30 years. 
Yet while Slotkin is a Democrat through and through, she’s adept at appealing to independents and moderates. 
That’s not true of El-Sayed, who has palled around with self-identified Marxist streamer Hasan Piker on the campaign trail, in addition to Sanders. 
“El-Sayed joins the list of radical leftists running nationally that will also cause consternation amongst mainstream Democrats,” former Michigan Republican Party Chairman Saul Anuzis told me. 
“Slotkin has already raised the alarm bells and that probably indicates she’s hearing from her constituency, and El-Sayed will need them as well.” 
Michigan could determine whether Republicans hold their Senate majority  and it’s the GOP’s best shot at flipping a seat outright. 
El-Sayed may be able to rally more radical progressives and the anti-Israel base in the primary, but that message will be a tougher sell to Michigan voters as a whole. 
As Anuzis put it, El-Sayed’s strength in the primary is his weakness in the general. 
“If he wins, then more mainstream Democrats, Reagan/Trump Democrats and culturally conservative, working-class independents will have to make a choice,” he said. 
“I think that greatly helps Rogers.” 
Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer has openly backed Stevens, the sitting congresswoman, in the race. 
He and other Democrats clearly think she’s best suited to take on Rogers in November. 
Along those lines, ahead of McMorrow dropping out of the race, retiring Sen. 
Peters told associates that Democrats need to back one of the more mainstream candidates to oppose El-Sayed, according to The Wall Street Journal. 
Still, El-Sayed has landed a coveted Michigan endorsement: that of the powerful United Auto Workers union, which praised the candidate for pushing forward “a strong working-class agenda with moral clarity.” 
And while some believe that McMorrow exiting the race will boost Stevens, that's far from a certainty. 
McMorrow notably did not throw her support behind one of the other contenders and her name will remain on the primary ballot. 
Following Zohran Mamdani’s successful bid in 2025 for mayor of New York City, U.S. 
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said he didn’t think the democratic socialist represented the future of the Democratic Party. 
With several more socialists recently winning seats in Congress, that looks a lot less certain. 
Whether El-Sayed prevails in the primary, and then wins over Michigan voters in November, will be the biggest test yet of how far left Democrats are willing to go. 
Ingrid Jacques is a columnist at USA TODAY. 
Contact her at ijacques@usatoday.com or on X, formerly Twitter: @Ingrid_Jacques 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.9%Ingrid Jacques: 5.2%USA TODAY: 8.0%Confirmation Bias15.9%This article: 2.9%Ingrid Jacques: 1.9%USA TODAY: 1.5%Anchoring Bias2.9%This article: 6.5%Ingrid Jacques: 2.7%USA TODAY: 5.6%Availability Heuristic6.5%This article: 2.6%Ingrid Jacques: 0.6%USA TODAY: 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic2.6%This article: 0.0%Ingrid Jacques: 0.6%USA TODAY: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Ingrid Jacques: 0.6%USA TODAY: 3.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 8.8%Ingrid Jacques: 15.5%USA TODAY: 13.0%Framing Effect8.8%This article: 3.3%Ingrid Jacques: 0.8%USA TODAY: 0.8%Loss Aversion3.3%This article: 3.6%Ingrid Jacques: 1.8%USA TODAY: 0.8%Status Quo Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Ingrid Jacques: 0.0%USA TODAY: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ingrid Jacques: 0.0%USA TODAY: 0.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 15.9%Ingrid Jacques: 5.0%USA TODAY: 2.8%Pessimism Bias15.9%This article: 32.5%Ingrid Jacques: 10.4%USA TODAY: 7.9%Negativity Bias32.5%This article: 3.2%Ingrid Jacques: 1.0%USA TODAY: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Ingrid Jacques: 0.0%USA TODAY: 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Ingrid Jacques: 0.0%USA TODAY: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%Ingrid Jacques: 3.8%USA TODAY: 8.9%In-Group Bias8.0%This article: 3.9%Ingrid Jacques: 3.1%USA TODAY: 8.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.9%This article: 7.1%Ingrid Jacques: 3.9%USA TODAY: 2.9%Halo Effect7.1%This article: 0.0%Ingrid Jacques: 1.7%USA TODAY: 1.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Ingrid Jacques: 0.0%USA TODAY: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.9%Ingrid Jacques: 1.7%USA TODAY: 0.8%Recency Bias6.9%This article: 9.5%Ingrid Jacques: 2.4%USA TODAY: 1.7%Primacy Effect9.5%This article: 0.0%Ingrid Jacques: 0.0%USA TODAY: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Ingrid Jacques: 3.5%USA TODAY: 2.5%Ad Hominem3.5%This article: 0.0%Ingrid Jacques: 0.0%USA TODAY: 5.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 17.4%Ingrid Jacques: 6.0%USA TODAY: 4.9%Appeal to Authority17.4%This article: 19.0%Ingrid Jacques: 7.0%USA TODAY: 4.6%False Dilemma19.0%This article: 0.0%Ingrid Jacques: 0.0%USA TODAY: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Ingrid Jacques: 0.0%USA TODAY: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 19.9%Ingrid Jacques: 8.9%USA TODAY: 11.3%Hasty Generalization19.9%This article: 0.0%Ingrid Jacques: 0.0%USA TODAY: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.1%Ingrid Jacques: 1.1%USA TODAY: 0.6%Bandwagon2.1%This article: 16.2%Ingrid Jacques: 6.7%USA TODAY: 7.0%Appeal to Emotion16.2%This article: 2.1%Ingrid Jacques: 0.5%USA TODAY: 2.7%Begging the Question2.1%This article: 7.9%Ingrid Jacques: 2.0%USA TODAY: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.9%This article: 0.0%Ingrid Jacques: 0.0%USA TODAY: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 6.6%Ingrid Jacques: 1.7%USA TODAY: 1.0%Burden of Proof6.6%This article: 0.0%Ingrid Jacques: 0.0%USA TODAY: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Ingrid Jacques: 0.0%USA TODAY: 0.7%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.1%Ingrid Jacques: 1.0%USA TODAY: 3.8%Anecdotal4.1%This article: 0.0%Ingrid Jacques: 0.0%USA TODAY: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.5%Ingrid Jacques: 0.1%USA TODAY: 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.5%This article: 0.0%Ingrid Jacques: 0.0%USA TODAY: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Ingrid Jacques: 0.0%USA TODAY: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Ingrid Jacques: 0.0%USA TODAY: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 1.7%Ingrid Jacques: 0.4%USA TODAY: 0.2%Special Pleading1.7%This article: 0.0%Ingrid Jacques: 0.9%USA TODAY: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 15.9%Ingrid Jacques: 4.0%USA TODAY: 1.7%Unattributed Quote15.9%This article: 8.3%Ingrid Jacques: 3.1%USA TODAY: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection8.3%This article: 6.8%Ingrid Jacques: 7.1%USA TODAY: 5.5%Biased Writer Voice6.8%This article: 4.4%Ingrid Jacques: 2.2%USA TODAY: 4.1%Indoctrination4.4%This article: 4.5%Ingrid Jacques: 1.1%USA TODAY: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias4.5%This article: 8.2%Ingrid Jacques: 16.0%USA TODAY: 25.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias8.2%This article: 6.0%Ingrid Jacques: 1.5%USA TODAY: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.0%

662 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers16%attributed speech558writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageElissa Slotkin • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageSaul Anuzis • 26 words • 0.0% coverageSaul Anuzis • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageSaul Anuzis • 22 words • 0.0% coverageSaul Anuzis • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Saul Anuzis

100%flagged-word coverage
77 attributed words74% of attributed speech96% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Unattributed Quote+15.2 ptsWriter: 14.7%Saul Anuzis: 29.9%29.9%Quote-first Misdirection-9.9 ptsWriter: 9.9%Saul Anuzis: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -9.7 ptsWriter: 9.7%Saul Anuzis: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-8.1 ptsWriter: 8.1%Saul Anuzis: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -7.2 ptsWriter: 7.2%Saul Anuzis: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-5.4 ptsWriter: 5.4%Saul Anuzis: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-5.2 ptsWriter: 5.2%Saul Anuzis: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.