Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 662 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ingrid Jacques results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 424 hits . Analysis detected 3,644 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,648 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,975 of 6,629 authors). This Ingrid Jacques is worse (more manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group. Ingrid Jacques
Author details
Total words: 2,648
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.2% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 16.0% 16.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.5% 15.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 16.0%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst