Speaker summary
34% 13 analyzed articles/videos 934.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erica Schwartz results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Overconfidence Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 240 hits . Analysis detected 1,545.974 faulty-reasoning hits from 934.333 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,931 of 28,364 speakers). This Erica Schwartz is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group. Erica Schwartz
Speaker details
Total words: 934.333
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.5% percentile 4.1% BS Score13 analyzed videos934.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.2% 7.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 9.7% 9.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 6.7% 6.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Begging the Question: Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 1.7% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Middle Ground: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.1% Bandwagon: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst