Speaker summary
53% 17 analyzed articles/videos 613 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Department of the Interior results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 302 hits . Analysis detected 1,637.016 faulty-reasoning hits from 613 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 7% (26,614 of 28,364 speakers). This Department of the Interior is better (less manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group. Department of the Interior
Speaker details
Total words: 613
Article count: 17
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.2% percentile 7.3% BS Score17 analyzed videos613 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 11.6% 11.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 11.6% 11.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 10.6% 10.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 17.1% 17.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 25.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 2.2% Tu Quoque: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 0.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 6.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst