Author summary
83%3 analyzed articles/videos3,905 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amy Qin results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 1,981 hits. Analysis detected 20,989 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,146 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,113 of 6,316 authors). This Amy Qin is worse (more manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
Amy Qin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
51%Amy Qin (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 18,146
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

51% percentile
025507510050.7% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles18.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.3%8.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 10.9%10.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.8%10.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.7%8.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.9%4.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.9%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 2.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.2%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate