Speaker summary
26% 13 analyzed articles/videos 519 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Department of Education results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 142 hits . Analysis detected 725 faulty-reasoning hits from 519 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,864 of 28,364 speakers). This Department of Education is better (less manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group. Department of Education
Speaker details
Total words: 519
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.8% percentile 4.3% BS Score13 analyzed videos519 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.1% 10.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst