Breitbart81%

PragerU CEO Applauds Linda McMahon’s Warning to Harvard on DEI 70%

By Alana Mastrangelo0% #author72%

7/9/2026, 2:17:09 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Begging the Question, and Framing Effect, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 34% saturation with 195 hits. Analysis detected 2,084 faulty-reasoning hits from 573 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 62.9% and a BS Rank of 70% (6,636 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 69.70% of the article peer group.

U.S. 
Education Secretary Linda McMahon warned Harvard that she will drop the “hammer” on the Ivy League university if it fails to stop Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives that violate federal law. 
“Having always the hammer  if you will  of investigation, of losing federal funding for research and programs, as well as having lawsuits potentially brought by the Department of Justice are certainly things that they bear in mind as well,” McMahon told Miranda Devine during Wednesday’s episode of Pod Force One . 
As Breitbart News previously reported , President Donald Trump issued an executive order to eliminate DEI at universities shortly after taking office in January last year. 
The Department of Education also launched investigations into Harvard over alleged antisemitism on campus and its use of race-based admissions policies. 
Meanwhile, the Department of Justice sued the Ivy League school, accusing it of withholding data related to those admissions. 
Nonetheless, McMahon is still warning that she will enact additional probes to hold Harvard accountable. 
“Parents and students across America are relieved we have a leader like Secretary Linda McMahon who won’t back down,” PragerU CEO Marissa Streit told Breitbart News. 
“President Trump believed when he nominated her she has the courage and the voice to stand up for America’s students, and he was right.” 
“Secretary McMahon’s warning this week is further proof she is exactly the kind of person students need who will confront the discriminatory practices Harvard and other institutions have implemented. 
She has demonstrated she is willing to do what is right for our kids  even if it doesn’t make her popular,” Streit continued. 
“Families want to know what their leaders stand for. 
We want to see more conviction like Secretary McMahon’s. 
We want to see leaders willing to fight,” the PragerU CEO added. 
In May 2025, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) pulled $2.2 billion in federal grants from Harvard, saying the school failed to comply with non-discrimination laws. 
A judge later ordered that the funding be restored  a move the Trump administration appealed. 
“It is not the goal or the desire of the federal government to take away that funding, because our research universities provide unbelievable amount of very effective and good research and invention for the country,” McMahon told Devine. 
“So, we want to make sure that that research can continue, but they just need to know that they’re going to have to operate within the confines of the law, to do that,” the Education Secretary added. 
Other schools, such as the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), have since shut down their DEI offices. 
“It is my sincere hope that many of them have seen the error in doing that,” McMahon said of DEI initiatives. 
“What we have seen as a result of a lot of the action that we have taken is there have been civics institutes set up on many of the campuses where civics is taught, history of our country is taught, and less of the ideology,” she added. 
“However,” McMahon said. 
“If I’m looking at it objectively, I would bet that there are many who have just changed the name and maybe given it enough window dressing to pass muster for the time being.” 
Alana Mastrangelo is a reporter for Breitbart News. 
You can follow her on Facebook and X at @ARmastrangelo , and on Instagram . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 17.5%Alana Mastrangelo: 7.7%Breitbart: 4.5%Confirmation Bias17.5%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.5%Alana Mastrangelo: 3.5%Breitbart: 3.9%Availability Heuristic7.5%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 2.8%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.7%Breitbart: 0.7%Hindsight Bias2.8%This article: 5.8%Alana Mastrangelo: 3.8%Breitbart: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias5.8%This article: 22.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 18.1%Breitbart: 11.9%Framing Effect22.0%This article: 21.3%Alana Mastrangelo: 5.3%Breitbart: 0.3%Loss Aversion21.3%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 11.2%Alana Mastrangelo: 2.8%Breitbart: 3.6%Optimism Bias11.2%This article: 9.4%Alana Mastrangelo: 3.8%Breitbart: 1.7%Pessimism Bias9.4%This article: 20.2%Alana Mastrangelo: 8.0%Breitbart: 9.7%Negativity Bias20.2%This article: 4.2%Alana Mastrangelo: 2.1%Breitbart: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 1.4%Breitbart: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 8.2%Alana Mastrangelo: 6.8%Breitbart: 4.7%In-Group Bias8.2%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 1.3%Breitbart: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 15.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 7.0%Breitbart: 3.1%Halo Effect15.0%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.6%Alana Mastrangelo: 1.4%Breitbart: 1.8%Recency Bias5.6%This article: 1.7%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.4%Breitbart: 0.6%Primacy Effect1.7%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.0%Breitbart: 2.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.0%Breitbart: 1.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 17.6%Alana Mastrangelo: 8.8%Breitbart: 4.2%Appeal to Authority17.6%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 4.7%Breitbart: 2.5%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.0%Breitbart: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 26.5%Alana Mastrangelo: 16.4%Breitbart: 7.9%Hasty Generalization26.5%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.2%Alana Mastrangelo: 3.9%Breitbart: 1.2%Bandwagon4.2%This article: 12.4%Alana Mastrangelo: 12.0%Breitbart: 8.8%Appeal to Emotion12.4%This article: 23.6%Alana Mastrangelo: 7.9%Breitbart: 1.8%Begging the Question23.6%This article: 8.2%Alana Mastrangelo: 2.1%Breitbart: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.2%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.0%Breitbart: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 6.6%Alana Mastrangelo: 1.7%Breitbart: 0.2%Appeal to Nature6.6%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 11.2%Alana Mastrangelo: 2.8%Breitbart: 2.5%Anecdotal11.2%This article: 3.7%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.9%Breitbart: 0.2%No True Scotsman3.7%This article: 16.8%Alana Mastrangelo: 4.2%Breitbart: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)16.8%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.0%Breitbart: 2.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 10.6%Alana Mastrangelo: 4.1%Breitbart: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection10.6%This article: 12.9%Alana Mastrangelo: 3.7%Breitbart: 7.8%Biased Writer Voice12.9%This article: 34.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 11.1%Breitbart: 1.9%Indoctrination34.0%This article: 0.0%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 20.4%Alana Mastrangelo: 22.2%Breitbart: 7.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias20.4%This article: 2.6%Alana Mastrangelo: 0.7%Breitbart: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.6%

573 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers81%attributed speech108writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageEducation Secretary Linda McMahon • 32 words • 100.0% coverageEducation Secretary Linda McMahon • 53 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageDepartment of Education • 21 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Justice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMarissa Streit • 26 words • 100.0% coverageMarissa Streit • 24 words • 100.0% coverageMarissa Streit • 29 words • 100.0% coverageMarissa Streit • 24 words • 100.0% coverageMarissa Streit • 9 words • 100.0% coverageMarissa Streit • 9 words • 100.0% coverageMarissa Streit • 12 words • 100.0% coverageDepartment of Health and Human Services (HHS) • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageEducation Secretary Linda McMahon • 38 words • 100.0% coverageEducation Secretary Linda McMahon • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageEducation Secretary Linda McMahon • 21 words • 100.0% coverageEducation Secretary Linda McMahon • 47 words • 100.0% coverageEducation Secretary Linda McMahon • 3 words • 0.0% coverageEducation Secretary Linda McMahon • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Marissa Streit

100%flagged-word coverage
133 attributed words29% of attributed speech92% writer coverage
0%40.0%80.0%Politically Right Leaning +59.4 ptsWriter: 15.7%Marissa Streit: 75.2%75.2%Indoctrination+46.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Marissa Streit: 46.6%46.6%Biased Writer Voice-33.3 ptsWriter: 33.3%Marissa Streit: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection+21.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Marissa Streit: 21.8%21.8%Attempt to Sell a Product -13.9 ptsWriter: 13.9%Marissa Streit: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.