Author summary
0% 9 analyzed articles/videos 3,023 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Noel Gasca results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 1,787 hits . Analysis detected 17,399 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,750 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (5,546 of 6,482 authors). This Noel Gasca is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group. Noel Gasca
Author details
Total words: 22,750
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score9 analyzed articles22.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst