Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These CT Mirror Staff results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 181 hits . Analysis detected 1,179 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,194 authors). This CT Mirror Staff is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. CT Mirror Staff
Author details
Total words: 3,408
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst