Speaker summary
55% 22 analyzed articles/videos 1,504 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Claudia Sheinbaum results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , In-Group Bias , and Pessimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 301.385 hits . Analysis detected 2,546.916 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,504 analyzed words across 22 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 2% (27,961 of 28,364 speakers). This Claudia Sheinbaum is better (less manipulative) than 98.60% of the peer group. Claudia Sheinbaum
Speaker details
Total words: 1,504
Article count: 22
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.4% percentile 4.0% BS Score22 analyzed videos1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 16.7% 16.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 7.9% 7.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% False Dilemma: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Special Pleading: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.3% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst